by Randy S » February 7, 2013, 3:16 am
Face it - The Postal Service has a long track record of waste. From a 2001 ABC News story: Monuments to WastePostal service managers have also received unusually large relocation packages in some cases.
When Richard Porras, the former chief financial officer of the Postal Service, moved from Fairfax, Va., to Vienna, Va. - a distance of 15 miles - he was given $142,000. On top of that he received $25,000 for miscellaneous expenses.
Porras has since retired, but he told ABC News by telephone that the expenses were approved.
The inspector general's report reveals managers at the Postal Service have also squandered millions of dollars on buildings and equipment.
In Charlottesville, Va., the Postal Service leased a building for $4.2 million for 20 years. Then it left that building empty for two years before subleasing it to a tractor supply company.
In Chicago, the construction of the main post office ended up costing $128 million more than the original budget.
In Seattle, postal officials bought a building without getting a detailed inspection. Later they discovered the building needed $23 million in repairs.
"It's outrageous," says Edward Hudgins of the Cato Institute. "If it did happen in the private sector, heads would roll, the people who wasted $23 million would be out looking for a job."
The Postal Service has also been criticized for spending $158 million in advertising for their overnight delivery services. Critics argue that the post office is a monopoly, and there is no need to advertise. The government agency even sponsors Lance Armstrong and the United States Cycling Team.
Despite criticism and big losses, postal officials have said that they will not cut their advertising budget.
"No business our size would operate without advertising to make people aware of the products they produce," Willhite said.
Face it - The Postal Service has a long track record of waste. From a 2001 ABC News story: [b]Monuments to Waste[/b]Postal service managers have also received unusually large relocation packages in some cases.
When Richard Porras, the former chief financial officer of the Postal Service, moved from Fairfax, Va., to Vienna, Va. - a distance of 15 miles - he was given $142,000. On top of that he received $25,000 for miscellaneous expenses.
Porras has since retired, but he told ABC News by telephone that the expenses were approved.
The inspector general's report reveals managers at the Postal Service have also squandered millions of dollars on buildings and equipment.
In Charlottesville, Va., the Postal Service leased a building for $4.2 million for 20 years. Then it left that building empty for two years before subleasing it to a tractor supply company.
In Chicago, the construction of the main post office ended up costing $128 million more than the original budget.
In Seattle, postal officials bought a building without getting a detailed inspection. Later they discovered the building needed $23 million in repairs.
"It's outrageous," says Edward Hudgins of the Cato Institute. "If it did happen in the private sector, heads would roll, the people who wasted $23 million would be out looking for a job."
The Postal Service has also been criticized for spending $158 million in advertising for their overnight delivery services. Critics argue that the post office is a monopoly, and there is no need to advertise. The government agency even sponsors Lance Armstrong and the United States Cycling Team.
Despite criticism and big losses, postal officials have said that they will not cut their advertising budget.
"No business our size would operate without advertising to make people aware of the products they produce," Willhite said.