by Canalwatcher » December 10, 2014, 8:31 am
Just a small correction to what NiagaraMike has said ...There were winters when the PWDD facility had more vessels than dock space. As drydocking in most cases only required a month or so, but varied; the tug James E.McGrath and another tug(s) would be tiedup at DD and used to shuttle vessels from dock to either the tieup wall or fitout berth or vice versa as required by DD. If the reach was scheduled to be emptied, drydockings had to coincide; in before draining out after flooding. This winter the upper tieup wall at lock 1 is scheduled for major work and lengthening back to its former length, so this reach will be empty. Also scheduled new tieup walls above and below lock 3 will mean that Canal reaches will be drained from lock 7 north to lock 1 during the Canal shutdown. Barry
Just a small correction to what NiagaraMike has said ...There were winters when the PWDD facility had more vessels than dock space. As drydocking in most cases only required a month or so, but varied; the tug James E.McGrath and another tug(s) would be tiedup at DD and used to shuttle vessels from dock to either the tieup wall or fitout berth or vice versa as required by DD. If the reach was scheduled to be emptied, drydockings had to coincide; in before draining out after flooding. This winter the upper tieup wall at lock 1 is scheduled for major work and lengthening back to its former length, so this reach will be empty. Also scheduled new tieup walls above and below lock 3 will mean that Canal reaches will be drained from lock 7 north to lock 1 during the Canal shutdown. Barry