by PDBLK25 » December 19, 2014, 9:15 pm
"Wharfrat1" brings up the possibility of using the retiring Algoma Progress' boom to replace the severely-damaged one on the MV. Algoway. I don't know what Algoma Central's plans are, but this certainly makes more sense than replacing the Algoway boom with that of the Algoma Transfer (as another post suggested). The booms from the Transfer (or the James Norris if still around) are of the modern, triangular, tubular design. The booms of the Algoway and the retiring Progress are both of the older type - rectangular, constructed of angular steel, heavier than the triangular booms. I'm no expert, but it seem more likely that Algoma would replace a damaged old-style boom with another undamaged old-style (rectangular) boom.
- Attachments
-

"Wharfrat1" brings up the possibility of using the retiring [i]Algoma Progress'[/i] boom to replace the severely-damaged one on the MV. [i]Algoway[/i]. I don't know what Algoma Central's plans are, but this certainly makes more sense than replacing the [i]Algoway[/i] boom with that of the [i]Algoma Transfer[/i] (as another post suggested). The booms from the [i]Transfer[/i] (or the [i]James Norris[/i] if still around) are of the modern, triangular, tubular design. The booms of the [i]Algoway[/i] and the retiring [i]Progress[/i] are both of the older type - rectangular, constructed of angular steel, heavier than the triangular booms. I'm no expert, but it seem more likely that Algoma would replace a damaged old-style boom with another undamaged old-style (rectangular) boom.