by hausen » May 30, 2011, 12:41 am
fireman12 wrote:But in reality they are Algoma`s now and with Algoma going in a new naming direction e.g. Algoma Mariner , Algoma Discovery etc , this is probably what will take place .
Very true. What's strange is that renaming vessels entails a fairly substantial expenditure of time and money, and these two ships likely only have a few years of sailing left. Algoma has already shown willingness to honor ULS heritage by keeping the names of the Norris and Leitch(s). One would think it would be a win win for them to keep
Montrealais and
Quebecois names as well; they'd save the money and trouble of changing the names on two vessels close to retirement, and they'd get to do that under the guise of honoring two of the finest and longest-lived Seaway-sized lakers ever built. And that's not to mention the Papachristidis heritage and all the citizens of two important St. Lawrence cities those two names are meant to honor.
[quote="fireman12"]But in reality they are Algoma`s now and with Algoma going in a new naming direction e.g. Algoma Mariner , Algoma Discovery etc , this is probably what will take place .[/quote]
Very true. What's strange is that renaming vessels entails a fairly substantial expenditure of time and money, and these two ships likely only have a few years of sailing left. Algoma has already shown willingness to honor ULS heritage by keeping the names of the Norris and Leitch(s). One would think it would be a win win for them to keep [i]Montrealais[/i] and [i]Quebecois[/i] names as well; they'd save the money and trouble of changing the names on two vessels close to retirement, and they'd get to do that under the guise of honoring two of the finest and longest-lived Seaway-sized lakers ever built. And that's not to mention the Papachristidis heritage and all the citizens of two important St. Lawrence cities those two names are meant to honor.