Rear lifeboat

Post a reply


BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are OFF

Topic review
   

If you wish to attach one or more files enter the details below.

Maximum filesize per attachment: 3 MiB.

Expand view Topic review: Rear lifeboat

Re: Rear lifeboat

by Guest » July 12, 2022, 7:10 pm

Here is part of the Federal Register which covers the Great Lakes and lifesaving equipment aboard US-flag Great Lakes vessels. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR- ... -11777.pdf

US-flagged Great Lakes vessels and Canadian vessels that operate west of a straight line from Capedes Rosiers to West Point, Anticosti Island and, on the north side of Anticosti Island, the 63rd Meridian do not have to meet SOLAS.

https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-46/c ... subpart-D/

Re: Rear lifeboat

by Capt » July 11, 2022, 9:38 pm

Only CSL removed the freefall lifeboats not any of the Algoma bulkers or tankers

Re: Rear lifeboat

by Jared » July 11, 2022, 9:23 pm

GuestfromEU wrote: July 11, 2022, 6:54 pm It may be the first US flag lake ship with a free fall lifeboat, but other US flag ships built for ocean trading have been fitted with free fall lifeboats for 30+ years.

Open lifeboats have not been replaced as US flag ships on the lakes are not subject to SOLAS requirements. The USCG has authorized replacement of lifeboats with motorized rescue boats and rafts on the Great Lakes. There are restrictions to this, but likely applicable only to ships that trade into the Gulf of St Lawrence.
I wonder why they are exempt from SOLAS?

Re: Rear lifeboat

by Guest » July 11, 2022, 9:12 pm

For the vast majority of the existing lakers with all-cabins aft, it's very difficult to install a free-falling lifeboat as the superstructure would require significant modification. Yes, the Canadian vessels built in China came with free-falling lifeboats, but they were quickly removed once they entered service on the lakes.

Re: Rear lifeboat

by GuestfromEU » July 11, 2022, 6:54 pm

It may be the first US flag lake ship with a free fall lifeboat, but other US flag ships built for ocean trading have been fitted with free fall lifeboats for 30+ years.

Open lifeboats have not been replaced as US flag ships on the lakes are not subject to SOLAS requirements. The USCG has authorized replacement of lifeboats with motorized rescue boats and rafts on the Great Lakes. There are restrictions to this, but likely applicable only to ships that trade into the Gulf of St Lawrence.

Re: Rear lifeboat

by Geest » July 9, 2022, 1:30 pm

Regardless of foreign builds being reflagged Canadian, its the first US Flag vessel with a free-fall lifeboat. Frankly, after El Faro and considering the water temperatures in the Lakes for most of the season, its shameful none of the US flag carriers haven't ditched their ancient uncovered davit boats for more modern lifesaving equipment. But profit is profit I suppose

Re: Rear lifeboat

by Guest » July 9, 2022, 10:14 am

I think it's the first US Flag Laker with a free fall stern lifeboat.

Re: Rear lifeboat

by guest » July 9, 2022, 3:34 am

puting aside the current mark w. barker the last essel to be built {laker} was the paterson in 1985

Re: Rear lifeboat

by Guest » July 8, 2022, 3:49 pm

None of those were built on the Lakes, right?

Re: Rear lifeboat

by E J B » July 8, 2022, 3:48 pm

What I read was the first time a stern lifeboat had been deployed.....

Rear lifeboat

by Guest » July 8, 2022, 10:35 am

The news today mentioned that the Mark Barker was the first rear mounted lifeboat launched on any of the lakes and that isn’t even close to being correct all the new Algoma vessels have them starting with the equinox but the Algoma tankers came with them even before that fyi

Top