by Halco » March 28, 2010, 4:21 pm
I'd think the CSL work regiment was part of the problem. Outward appearances also seem to show little budget for paint or maintenance, and I'm sure the cost of operating the turbine in comparison to their diesel boats is a factor as well. I don't know for certain, but I'd imagine she probably needs engine and hull work, and likely a 5 year survey.
Hopefully she doesn't follow in the footsteps of Saguenay, Tarantau and Manitoulin, but also consider that the Desmarais, McGiffin, Griffith and Parisien weren't really that old when their forebodies were replaced. I imagine CSL doesn't invest in much year to year maintenance, instead a big expenditure when the boat wears out, rebuild or replace.
I guess time will tell. Self unloaders, especially with the cubic coal hauling capacity of the Halifax are hard to replace, but steam power is a downer in this case.
Hopefully the old Frankcliffe will raise steam again.
I'd think the CSL work regiment was part of the problem. Outward appearances also seem to show little budget for paint or maintenance, and I'm sure the cost of operating the turbine in comparison to their diesel boats is a factor as well. I don't know for certain, but I'd imagine she probably needs engine and hull work, and likely a 5 year survey.
Hopefully she doesn't follow in the footsteps of Saguenay, Tarantau and Manitoulin, but also consider that the Desmarais, McGiffin, Griffith and Parisien weren't really that old when their forebodies were replaced. I imagine CSL doesn't invest in much year to year maintenance, instead a big expenditure when the boat wears out, rebuild or replace.
I guess time will tell. Self unloaders, especially with the cubic coal hauling capacity of the Halifax are hard to replace, but steam power is a downer in this case.
Hopefully the old Frankcliffe will raise steam again.