by spb » August 23, 2012, 12:10 pm
This will relate to the question raised a couple of weeks ago about the longest vessels on the Lakes.
First of all, my apologies for the omission and the error on the list I sent in. No question, the lengthened Cliffs Victory belongs there and the Barker, not the Stinson, was the first 1004er.
My excuse is that I was 200+ miles north of home, with limited data with me. Shoulda waited till I got home, but I wanted to get the guy who submitted the question his answer as soon as possible, so I built a list from scratch with what I had to get it done now.
I do have a comment to make about the Frankcliffe inches. Hall built six Seaway size vessels during the 1960s. I assume they were all built to the same general plans (with a 730-foot overall length). The various sources differ on the LOA. I've seen at least two (other than 730) for Frankcliffe, also some that give Beavercliffe another inch or so, and one that gives Lawrencecliffe even one more inch. They all were measured for Canadian registry at the same length (712.4 feet) except Leecliffe (714.4 and some reports have her several inches shy of 730 LOA!) and Ottercliffe at 712.2).
Are these couple of inches variations for sister vessels planned or designed that way, and if not planned, how do we find the differences? If you took a yardstick to the four 1004s built at Lorain, would they all measure exactly 1004 feet, no inches? Or were all five Supers exactly 639'6"?
I think I will leave these little variations off the list until it is verified that they really exist.
I am relatively new to this Discussion Board group but I have to say that I'm really impressed with the way so many people respond to questions asked here or come up with corrections when they are needed. It keeps us all on our toes and helps us all be able to keep better records.
This will relate to the question raised a couple of weeks ago about the longest vessels on the Lakes.
First of all, my apologies for the omission and the error on the list I sent in. No question, the lengthened Cliffs Victory belongs there and the Barker, not the Stinson, was the first 1004er.
My excuse is that I was 200+ miles north of home, with limited data with me. Shoulda waited till I got home, but I wanted to get the guy who submitted the question his answer as soon as possible, so I built a list from scratch with what I had to get it done now.
I do have a comment to make about the Frankcliffe inches. Hall built six Seaway size vessels during the 1960s. I assume they were all built to the same general plans (with a 730-foot overall length). The various sources differ on the LOA. I've seen at least two (other than 730) for Frankcliffe, also some that give Beavercliffe another inch or so, and one that gives Lawrencecliffe even one more inch. They all were measured for Canadian registry at the same length (712.4 feet) except Leecliffe (714.4 and some reports have her several inches shy of 730 LOA!) and Ottercliffe at 712.2).
Are these couple of inches variations for sister vessels planned or designed that way, and if not planned, how do we find the differences? If you took a yardstick to the four 1004s built at Lorain, would they all measure exactly 1004 feet, no inches? Or were all five Supers exactly 639'6"?
I think I will leave these little variations off the list until it is verified that they really exist.
I am relatively new to this Discussion Board group but I have to say that I'm really impressed with the way so many people respond to questions asked here or come up with corrections when they are needed. It keeps us all on our toes and helps us all be able to keep better records.